Based on 5 and 5 real audits
| Metric | Apache Tomcat | Skolengo | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 40 | 40 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 94 | 94 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 83 | 83 | Tie |
| SEO | 93 | 93 | Tie |
| Security | 63 | 63 | Tie |
| TTFB | 230ms | 230ms | Tie |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
Apache Tomcat and Skolengo are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Apache Tomcat has a composite score of 73 while Skolengo scores 73.
Apache Tomcat doesn't clearly lead Skolengo in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Skolengo doesn't clearly lead Apache Tomcat in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 5 audited Apache Tomcat sites and 5 audited Skolengo sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback