Based on 5 and 441 real audits
| Metric | Apache Tomcat | Varnish | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 40 | 44 | Varnish |
| Accessibility | 94 | 89 | Apache Tomcat |
| Best Practices | 83 | 89 | Varnish |
| SEO | 93 | 91 | Apache Tomcat |
| Security | 63 | 65 | Varnish |
| TTFB | 230ms | 202ms | Varnish |
| Composite | 73 | 74 | Varnish |
Varnish outperforms Apache Tomcat in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Apache Tomcat leads in accessibility, SEO.
Choose Apache Tomcat when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Varnish when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 5 audited Apache Tomcat sites and 441 audited Varnish sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback