Based on 14 and 16 real audits
| Metric | Apache Traffic Server | MediaWiki | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 59 | 84 | MediaWiki |
| Accessibility | 84 | 86 | MediaWiki |
| Best Practices | 90 | 97 | MediaWiki |
| SEO | 93 | 88 | Apache Traffic Server |
| Security | 73 | 70 | Apache Traffic Server |
| TTFB | 226ms | 170ms | MediaWiki |
| Composite | 76 | 79 | MediaWiki |
MediaWiki outperforms Apache Traffic Server in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 76). Apache Traffic Server leads in SEO, security.
Choose Apache Traffic Server when your primary concern is SEO and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose MediaWiki when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 14 audited Apache Traffic Server sites and 16 audited MediaWiki sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback