Based on 14 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Apache Traffic Server | metisMenu | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 59 | 69 | metisMenu |
| Accessibility | 84 | 86 | metisMenu |
| Best Practices | 90 | 100 | metisMenu |
| SEO | 93 | 91 | Apache Traffic Server |
| Security | 73 | 77 | metisMenu |
| TTFB | 226ms | 403ms | Apache Traffic Server |
| Composite | 76 | 80 | metisMenu |
metisMenu outperforms Apache Traffic Server in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 76). Apache Traffic Server leads in SEO, TTFB.
Choose Apache Traffic Server when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose metisMenu when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 14 audited Apache Traffic Server sites and 2 audited metisMenu sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback