Skip to content

Apache Traffic Server vs Next.js

Based on 13 and 597 real audits

View Apache Traffic Server details | View Next.js details
MetricApache Traffic ServerNext.jsWinner
Performance6038Apache Traffic Server
Accessibility8390Next.js
Best Practices9088Apache Traffic Server
SEO9294Next.js
Security7267Apache Traffic Server
TTFB209ms289msApache Traffic Server
Composite7674Apache Traffic Server
Performance
Apache Traffic Server
60
Next.js
38
Accessibility
Apache Traffic Server
83
Next.js
90
Security
Apache Traffic Server
72
Next.js
67
SEO
Apache Traffic Server
92
Next.js
94
Composite
Apache Traffic Server
76
Next.js
74

Apache Traffic Server outperforms Next.js in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 74). Next.js leads in accessibility, SEO.

When to choose Apache Traffic Server

Choose Apache Traffic Server when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Next.js

Choose Next.js when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 13 audited Apache Traffic Server sites and 597 audited Next.js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Apache Traffic Server or Next.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Apache Traffic Server sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (60 vs 38 on average).
Which has better security, Apache Traffic Server or Next.js?
Apache Traffic Server sites score higher on security analysis (72 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Apache Traffic Server or Next.js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Next.js (90 vs 83). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Apache Traffic Server or Next.js?
Next.js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Apache Traffic Server or Next.js?
Apache Traffic Server sites show lower Time to First Byte (209 ms vs 289 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Apache Traffic Server or Next.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Apache Traffic Server scores higher on overall composite score while Apache Traffic Server may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback