Skip to content

Apache vs core-js

Based on 450 and 1570 real audits

View Apache details | View core-js details
MetricApachecore-jsWinner
Performance5036Apache
Accessibility8788core-js
Best Practices8884Apache
SEO9091core-js
Security6565Tie
TTFB549ms371mscore-js
Composite7372Apache
Performance
Apache
50
core-js
36
Accessibility
Apache
87
core-js
88
Security
Apache
65
core-js
65
SEO
Apache
90
core-js
91
Composite
Apache
73
core-js
72

Apache and core-js are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Apache has a composite score of 73 while core-js scores 72.

When to choose Apache

Choose Apache when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose core-js

Choose core-js when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 450 audited Apache sites and 1570 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Apache or core-js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Apache sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (50 vs 36 on average).
Which has better security, Apache or core-js?
Apache sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Apache or core-js?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor core-js (88 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Apache or core-js?
core-js sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Apache or core-js?
core-js sites show lower Time to First Byte (371 ms vs 549 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Apache or core-js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Apache scores higher on overall composite score while Apache may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback