Skip to content

Apache vs CREMA

Based on 452 and 1 real audits

View Apache details | View CREMA details
MetricApacheCREMAWinner
Performance5027Apache
Accessibility8777Apache
Best Practices8873Apache
SEO9083Apache
Security6576CREMA
TTFB551ms1058msApache
Composite7373Tie
Performance
Apache
50
CREMA
27
Accessibility
Apache
87
CREMA
77
Security
Apache
65
CREMA
76
SEO
Apache
90
CREMA
83
Composite
Apache
73
CREMA
73

Apache outperforms CREMA in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). CREMA leads in security.

When to choose Apache

Choose Apache when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose CREMA

Choose CREMA when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 452 audited Apache sites and 1 audited CREMA sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Apache or CREMA?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Apache sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (50 vs 27 on average).
Which has better security, Apache or CREMA?
CREMA sites score higher on security analysis (76 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Apache or CREMA?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Apache (87 vs 77). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Apache or CREMA?
Apache sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 83 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Apache or CREMA?
Apache sites show lower Time to First Byte (551 ms vs 1058 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Apache or CREMA for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Apache scores higher on overall composite score while Apache may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback