| Metric | Apache | DreamWeaver | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 49 | 28 | Apache |
| Accessibility | 87 | 70 | Apache |
| Best Practices | 88 | 92 | DreamWeaver |
| SEO | 90 | 89 | Apache |
| Security | 64 | 63 | Apache |
| TTFB | 548ms | 960ms | Apache |
| Composite | 72 | 68 | Apache |
Apache outperforms DreamWeaver in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 68). DreamWeaver leads in best practices.
Choose Apache when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose DreamWeaver when your primary concern is best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 431 audited Apache sites and 4 audited DreamWeaver sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback