Skip to content

Apache vs MDBootstrap

Based on 542 and 1 real audits

View Apache details | View MDBootstrap details
MetricApacheMDBootstrapWinner
Performance510Apache
Accessibility8686Tie
Best Practices8878Apache
SEO90100MDBootstrap
Security6774MDBootstrap
TTFB646ms629msMDBootstrap
Composite7480MDBootstrap
Performance
Apache
51
MDBootstrap
0
Accessibility
Apache
86
MDBootstrap
86
Security
Apache
67
MDBootstrap
74
SEO
Apache
90
MDBootstrap
100
Composite
Apache
74
MDBootstrap
80

MDBootstrap outperforms Apache in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 74). Apache leads in performance, best practices.

When to choose Apache

Choose Apache when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose MDBootstrap

Choose MDBootstrap when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 542 audited Apache sites and 1 audited MDBootstrap sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Apache or MDBootstrap?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Apache sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (51 vs 0 on average).
Which has better security, Apache or MDBootstrap?
MDBootstrap sites score higher on security analysis (74 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Apache or MDBootstrap?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Apache (86 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Apache or MDBootstrap?
MDBootstrap sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Apache or MDBootstrap?
MDBootstrap sites show lower Time to First Byte (629 ms vs 646 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Apache or MDBootstrap for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Apache scores higher on overall composite score while Apache may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback