Skip to content

Apache vs metisMenu

Based on 536 and 4 real audits

View Apache details | View metisMenu details
MetricApachemetisMenuWinner
Performance5157metisMenu
Accessibility8687metisMenu
Best Practices8898metisMenu
SEO9095metisMenu
Security6778metisMenu
TTFB645ms1278msApache
Composite7479metisMenu
Performance
Apache
51
metisMenu
57
Accessibility
Apache
86
metisMenu
87
Security
Apache
67
metisMenu
78
SEO
Apache
90
metisMenu
95
Composite
Apache
74
metisMenu
79

metisMenu outperforms Apache in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (79 vs 74). Apache leads in TTFB.

When to choose Apache

Choose Apache when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose metisMenu

Choose metisMenu when your primary concern is security and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 536 audited Apache sites and 4 audited metisMenu sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Apache or metisMenu?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, metisMenu sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (57 vs 51 on average).
Which has better security, Apache or metisMenu?
metisMenu sites score higher on security analysis (78 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Apache or metisMenu?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor metisMenu (87 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Apache or metisMenu?
metisMenu sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (95 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Apache or metisMenu?
Apache sites show lower Time to First Byte (645 ms vs 1278 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Apache or metisMenu for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. metisMenu scores higher on overall composite score while Apache may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback