| Metric | Apache | Nginx | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 50 | 51 | Nginx |
| Accessibility | 87 | 86 | Apache |
| Best Practices | 88 | 87 | Apache |
| SEO | 90 | 91 | Nginx |
| Security | 65 | 67 | Nginx |
| TTFB | 552ms | 478ms | Nginx |
| Composite | 73 | 74 | Nginx |
Nginx outperforms Apache in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Apache leads in accessibility, best practices.
Choose Apache when your primary concern is accessibility and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Nginx when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 445 audited Apache sites and 956 audited Nginx sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback