| Metric | Apache | Nginx | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 51 | 53 | Nginx |
| Accessibility | 86 | 86 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| SEO | 90 | 91 | Nginx |
| Security | 67 | 69 | Nginx |
| TTFB | 646ms | 573ms | Nginx |
| Composite | 74 | 75 | Nginx |
Nginx outperforms Apache in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 74). Apache leads in no categories.
Apache doesn't clearly lead Nginx in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Choose Nginx when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 539 audited Apache sites and 1158 audited Nginx sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback