Skip to content

Apache vs Perl

Based on 452 and 8 real audits

View Apache details | View Perl details
MetricApachePerlWinner
Performance5058Perl
Accessibility8786Apache
Best Practices8893Perl
SEO9090Tie
Security6564Apache
TTFB551ms422msPerl
Composite7373Tie
Performance
Apache
50
Perl
58
Accessibility
Apache
87
Perl
86
Security
Apache
65
Perl
64
SEO
Apache
90
Perl
90
Composite
Apache
73
Perl
73

Perl outperforms Apache in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Apache leads in accessibility, security.

When to choose Apache

Choose Apache when your primary concern is accessibility and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Perl

Choose Perl when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 452 audited Apache sites and 8 audited Perl sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Apache or Perl?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Perl sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (58 vs 50 on average).
Which has better security, Apache or Perl?
Apache sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Apache or Perl?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Apache (87 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Apache or Perl?
Apache sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Apache or Perl?
Perl sites show lower Time to First Byte (422 ms vs 551 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Apache or Perl for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Perl scores higher on overall composite score while Apache may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback