Skip to content

Apache vs Red Hat

Based on 579 and 21 real audits

View Apache details | View Red Hat details
MetricApacheRed HatWinner
Performance5243Apache
Accessibility8690Red Hat
Best Practices8884Apache
SEO9091Red Hat
Security6863Apache
TTFB644ms608msRed Hat
Composite7472Apache
Performance
Apache
52
Red Hat
43
Accessibility
Apache
86
Red Hat
90
Security
Apache
68
Red Hat
63
SEO
Apache
90
Red Hat
91
Composite
Apache
74
Red Hat
72

Apache outperforms Red Hat in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Red Hat leads in accessibility, SEO, TTFB.

When to choose Apache

Choose Apache when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Red Hat

Choose Red Hat when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 579 audited Apache sites and 21 audited Red Hat sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Apache or Red Hat?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Apache sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (52 vs 43 on average).
Which has better security, Apache or Red Hat?
Apache sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Apache or Red Hat?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Red Hat (90 vs 86). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Apache or Red Hat?
Red Hat sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Apache or Red Hat?
Red Hat sites show lower Time to First Byte (608 ms vs 644 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Apache or Red Hat for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Apache scores higher on overall composite score while Apache may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback