Skip to content

Apache vs Skrollr

Based on 550 and 11 real audits

View Apache details | View Skrollr details
MetricApacheSkrollrWinner
Performance5137Apache
Accessibility8680Apache
Best Practices8878Apache
SEO9089Apache
Security6768Skrollr
TTFB652ms1005msApache
Composite7474Tie
Performance
Apache
51
Skrollr
37
Accessibility
Apache
86
Skrollr
80
Security
Apache
67
Skrollr
68
SEO
Apache
90
Skrollr
89
Composite
Apache
74
Skrollr
74

Apache outperforms Skrollr in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 74). Skrollr leads in security.

When to choose Apache

Choose Apache when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Skrollr

Choose Skrollr when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 550 audited Apache sites and 11 audited Skrollr sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Apache or Skrollr?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Apache sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (51 vs 37 on average).
Which has better security, Apache or Skrollr?
Skrollr sites score higher on security analysis (68 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Apache or Skrollr?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Apache (86 vs 80). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Apache or Skrollr?
Apache sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (90 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Apache or Skrollr?
Apache sites show lower Time to First Byte (652 ms vs 1005 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Apache or Skrollr for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Apache scores higher on overall composite score while Apache may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback