Based on 5 and 1688 real audits
| Metric | ApexCharts.js | core-js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 36 | ApexCharts.js |
| Accessibility | 90 | 88 | ApexCharts.js |
| Best Practices | 96 | 84 | ApexCharts.js |
| SEO | 88 | 91 | core-js |
| Security | 69 | 66 | ApexCharts.js |
| TTFB | 409ms | 396ms | core-js |
| Composite | 74 | 73 | ApexCharts.js |
ApexCharts.js outperforms core-js in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). core-js leads in SEO, TTFB.
Choose ApexCharts.js when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose core-js when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 5 audited ApexCharts.js sites and 1688 audited core-js sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback