Based on 5 and 12 real audits
| Metric | ApexCharts.js | Raphael | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 60 | Raphael |
| Accessibility | 90 | 72 | ApexCharts.js |
| Best Practices | 96 | 95 | ApexCharts.js |
| SEO | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Security | 69 | 73 | Raphael |
| TTFB | 409ms | 545ms | ApexCharts.js |
| Composite | 74 | 76 | Raphael |
ApexCharts.js and Raphael are closely matched, each leading in different categories. ApexCharts.js has a composite score of 74 while Raphael scores 76.
Choose ApexCharts.js when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Raphael when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 5 audited ApexCharts.js sites and 12 audited Raphael sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback