Based on 1 and 25 real audits
| Metric | ApexPages | Salesforce | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 17 | 31 | Salesforce |
| Accessibility | 88 | 88 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 69 | 84 | Salesforce |
| SEO | 75 | 88 | Salesforce |
| Security | 74 | 64 | ApexPages |
| TTFB | 61ms | 367ms | ApexPages |
| Composite | 71 | 71 | Tie |
Salesforce outperforms ApexPages in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 71). ApexPages leads in security, TTFB.
Choose ApexPages when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Salesforce when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited ApexPages sites and 25 audited Salesforce sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback