| Metric | Apollo | Lunr.js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 31 | 58 | Lunr.js |
| Accessibility | 90 | 85 | Apollo |
| Best Practices | 85 | 96 | Lunr.js |
| SEO | 93 | 84 | Apollo |
| Security | 65 | 75 | Lunr.js |
| TTFB | 313ms | 388ms | Apollo |
| Composite | 72 | 75 | Lunr.js |
Lunr.js outperforms Apollo in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 72). Apollo leads in accessibility, SEO, TTFB.
Send Feedback