Skip to content

Apollo vs Open Graph

Based on 45 and 3415 real audits

View Apollo details | View Open Graph details
MetricApolloOpen GraphWinner
Performance3045Open Graph
Accessibility8989Tie
Best Practices8587Open Graph
SEO9392Apollo
Security6566Open Graph
TTFB309ms365msApollo
Composite7374Open Graph
Performance
Apollo
30
Open Graph
45
Accessibility
Apollo
89
Open Graph
89
Security
Apollo
65
Open Graph
66
SEO
Apollo
93
Open Graph
92
Composite
Apollo
73
Open Graph
74

Open Graph outperforms Apollo in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Apollo leads in SEO, TTFB.

When to choose Apollo

Choose Apollo when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Open Graph

Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 45 audited Apollo sites and 3415 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Apollo or Open Graph?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (45 vs 30 on average).
Which has better security, Apollo or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Apollo or Open Graph?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Apollo (89 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Apollo or Open Graph?
Apollo sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Apollo or Open Graph?
Apollo sites show lower Time to First Byte (309 ms vs 365 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Apollo or Open Graph for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Open Graph scores higher on overall composite score while Apollo may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback