Skip to content

Apollo vs Prepr

Based on 46 and 1 real audits

View Apollo details | View Prepr details
MetricApolloPreprWinner
Performance3028Apollo
Accessibility8991Prepr
Best Practices8577Apollo
SEO93100Prepr
Security6581Prepr
TTFB307ms227msPrepr
Composite7380Prepr
Performance
Apollo
30
Prepr
28
Accessibility
Apollo
89
Prepr
91
Security
Apollo
65
Prepr
81
SEO
Apollo
93
Prepr
100
Composite
Apollo
73
Prepr
80

Prepr outperforms Apollo in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 73). Apollo leads in performance, best practices.

When to choose Apollo

Choose Apollo when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Prepr

Choose Prepr when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 46 audited Apollo sites and 1 audited Prepr sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Apollo or Prepr?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Apollo sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (30 vs 28 on average).
Which has better security, Apollo or Prepr?
Prepr sites score higher on security analysis (81 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Apollo or Prepr?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Prepr (91 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Apollo or Prepr?
Prepr sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 93 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Apollo or Prepr?
Prepr sites show lower Time to First Byte (227 ms vs 307 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Apollo or Prepr for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Apollo scores higher on overall composite score while Apollo may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback