Skip to content

Apollo vs Underscore.js

Based on 4 and 5 real audits

View Apollo details | View Underscore.js details
MetricApolloUnderscore.jsWinner
Performance3235Underscore.js
Accessibility8687Underscore.js
Best Practices8877Apollo
SEO9489Apollo
Security5966Underscore.js
TTFB225ms1225msApollo
Composite7071Underscore.js
Performance
Apollo
32
Underscore.js
35
Accessibility
Apollo
86
Underscore.js
87
Security
Apollo
59
Underscore.js
66
SEO
Apollo
94
Underscore.js
89
Composite
Apollo
70
Underscore.js
71

Underscore.js outperforms Apollo in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 70). Apollo leads in best practices, SEO, TTFB.

FAQ

Which is faster, Apollo or Underscore.js?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Underscore.js sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (35 vs 32 on average).
Which has better security, Apollo or Underscore.js?
Underscore.js sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 59 on average).
Should I choose Apollo or Underscore.js for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Underscore.js scores higher on performance while Apollo may excel in other areas. Run a free BeaverCheck audit to compare specific metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback