| Metric | Apollo | Vidazoo | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 30 | 25 | Apollo |
| Accessibility | 89 | 84 | Apollo |
| Best Practices | 85 | 73 | Apollo |
| SEO | 93 | 92 | Apollo |
| Security | 65 | 79 | Vidazoo |
| TTFB | 309ms | 129ms | Vidazoo |
| Composite | 73 | 77 | Vidazoo |
Apollo outperforms Vidazoo in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 77). Vidazoo leads in security, TTFB, composite score.
Choose Apollo when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Vidazoo when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 45 audited Apollo sites and 1 audited Vidazoo sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback