Skip to content

Apollo vs Webpack

Based on 45 and 956 real audits

View Apollo details | View Webpack details
MetricApolloWebpackWinner
Performance3038Webpack
Accessibility8989Tie
Best Practices8587Webpack
SEO9392Apollo
Security6566Webpack
TTFB309ms305msWebpack
Composite7373Tie
Performance
Apollo
30
Webpack
38
Accessibility
Apollo
89
Webpack
89
Security
Apollo
65
Webpack
66
SEO
Apollo
93
Webpack
92
Composite
Apollo
73
Webpack
73

Webpack outperforms Apollo in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Apollo leads in SEO.

When to choose Apollo

Choose Apollo when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Webpack

Choose Webpack when your primary concern is performance and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 45 audited Apollo sites and 956 audited Webpack sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Apollo or Webpack?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Webpack sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (38 vs 30 on average).
Which has better security, Apollo or Webpack?
Webpack sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Apollo or Webpack?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Apollo (89 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Apollo or Webpack?
Apollo sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Apollo or Webpack?
Webpack sites show lower Time to First Byte (305 ms vs 309 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Apollo or Webpack for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Webpack scores higher on overall composite score while Apollo may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback