Based on 47 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Apple Pay | Fast Simon | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 28 | 21 | Apple Pay |
| Accessibility | 87 | 92 | Fast Simon |
| Best Practices | 81 | 77 | Apple Pay |
| SEO | 92 | 85 | Apple Pay |
| Security | 71 | 71 | Tie |
| TTFB | 224ms | 180ms | Fast Simon |
| Composite | 73 | 72 | Apple Pay |
Apple Pay outperforms Fast Simon in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Fast Simon leads in accessibility, TTFB.
Choose Apple Pay when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Fast Simon when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 47 audited Apple Pay sites and 1 audited Fast Simon sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback