Based on 58 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Apple Pay | Kiwi Sizing | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 31 | 30 | Apple Pay |
| Accessibility | 87 | 89 | Kiwi Sizing |
| Best Practices | 83 | 73 | Apple Pay |
| SEO | 92 | 85 | Apple Pay |
| Security | 72 | 82 | Kiwi Sizing |
| TTFB | 308ms | 965ms | Apple Pay |
| Composite | 74 | 81 | Kiwi Sizing |
Apple Pay outperforms Kiwi Sizing in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 81). Kiwi Sizing leads in accessibility, security, composite score.
Choose Apple Pay when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Kiwi Sizing when your primary concern is security and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 58 audited Apple Pay sites and 1 audited Kiwi Sizing sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback