Based on 47 and 2 real audits
| Metric | Apple Pay | Lucky Orange | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 28 | 38 | Lucky Orange |
| Accessibility | 87 | 90 | Lucky Orange |
| Best Practices | 81 | 77 | Apple Pay |
| SEO | 92 | 96 | Lucky Orange |
| Security | 71 | 76 | Lucky Orange |
| TTFB | 224ms | 302ms | Apple Pay |
| Composite | 73 | 76 | Lucky Orange |
Lucky Orange outperforms Apple Pay in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 73). Apple Pay leads in best practices, TTFB.
Choose Apple Pay when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Lucky Orange when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 47 audited Apple Pay sites and 2 audited Lucky Orange sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback