Based on 47 and 5 real audits
| Metric | Apple Pay | Swym Wishlist Plus | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 28 | 27 | Apple Pay |
| Accessibility | 87 | 87 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 81 | 86 | Swym Wishlist Plus |
| SEO | 92 | 90 | Apple Pay |
| Security | 71 | 72 | Swym Wishlist Plus |
| TTFB | 224ms | 219ms | Swym Wishlist Plus |
| Composite | 73 | 73 | Tie |
Swym Wishlist Plus outperforms Apple Pay in 3 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Apple Pay leads in performance, SEO.
Choose Apple Pay when your primary concern is SEO and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Swym Wishlist Plus when your primary concern is best practices and server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 47 audited Apple Pay sites and 5 audited Swym Wishlist Plus sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback