Based on 16 and 1 real audits
| Metric | Apple Sign-in | ECharts | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 34 | 41 | ECharts |
| Accessibility | 88 | 75 | Apple Sign-in |
| Best Practices | 82 | 77 | Apple Sign-in |
| SEO | 95 | 85 | Apple Sign-in |
| Security | 66 | 64 | Apple Sign-in |
| TTFB | 211ms | 687ms | Apple Sign-in |
| Composite | 73 | 72 | Apple Sign-in |
Apple Sign-in outperforms ECharts in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). ECharts leads in performance.
Choose Apple Sign-in when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose ECharts when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 16 audited Apple Sign-in sites and 1 audited ECharts sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback