Skip to content

Apple vs Clever

Based on 1275 and 1 real audits

MetricAppleCleverWinner
Performance3944Clever
Accessibility9096Clever
Best Practices8681Apple
SEO8992Clever
Security6765Apple
TTFB317ms269msClever
Composite7370Apple
Performance
Apple
39
Clever
44
Accessibility
Apple
90
Clever
96
Security
Apple
67
Clever
65
SEO
Apple
89
Clever
92
Composite
Apple
73
Clever
70

Clever outperforms Apple in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (70 vs 73). Apple leads in best practices, security, composite score.

When to choose Apple

Choose Apple when your primary concern is best practices and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Clever

Choose Clever when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1275 audited Apple sites and 1 audited Clever sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Apple or Clever?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Clever sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (44 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Apple or Clever?
Apple sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 65 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Apple or Clever?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Clever (96 vs 90). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Apple or Clever?
Clever sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Apple or Clever?
Clever sites show lower Time to First Byte (269 ms vs 317 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Apple or Clever for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Clever scores higher on overall composite score while Apple may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback