Skip to content

Apple vs Crazy Egg

Based on 1267 and 64 real audits

View Apple details | View Crazy Egg details
MetricAppleCrazy EggWinner
Performance3936Apple
Accessibility9090Tie
Best Practices8687Crazy Egg
SEO8993Crazy Egg
Security6764Apple
TTFB318ms738msApple
Composite7372Apple
Performance
Apple
39
Crazy Egg
36
Accessibility
Apple
90
Crazy Egg
90
Security
Apple
67
Crazy Egg
64
SEO
Apple
89
Crazy Egg
93
Composite
Apple
73
Crazy Egg
72

Apple outperforms Crazy Egg in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 72). Crazy Egg leads in best practices, SEO.

When to choose Apple

Choose Apple when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Crazy Egg

Choose Crazy Egg when your primary concern is SEO and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1267 audited Apple sites and 64 audited Crazy Egg sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Apple or Crazy Egg?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Apple sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 36 on average).
Which has better security, Apple or Crazy Egg?
Apple sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Apple or Crazy Egg?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Apple (90 vs 90). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Apple or Crazy Egg?
Crazy Egg sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (93 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Apple or Crazy Egg?
Apple sites show lower Time to First Byte (318 ms vs 738 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Apple or Crazy Egg for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Apple scores higher on overall composite score while Apple may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback