| Metric | Apple | Ember.js | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 38 | 47 | Ember.js |
| Accessibility | 90 | 91 | Ember.js |
| Best Practices | 86 | 86 | Tie |
| SEO | 89 | 100 | Ember.js |
| Security | 66 | 68 | Ember.js |
| TTFB | 314ms | 491ms | Apple |
| Composite | 72 | 74 | Ember.js |
Ember.js outperforms Apple in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 72). Apple leads in TTFB.
Send Feedback