Skip to content

Apple vs Foursixty

Based on 1275 and 1 real audits

View Apple details | View Foursixty details
MetricAppleFoursixtyWinner
Performance3916Apple
Accessibility9093Foursixty
Best Practices8677Apple
SEO89100Foursixty
Security6770Foursixty
TTFB317ms156msFoursixty
Composite7374Foursixty
Performance
Apple
39
Foursixty
16
Accessibility
Apple
90
Foursixty
93
Security
Apple
67
Foursixty
70
SEO
Apple
89
Foursixty
100
Composite
Apple
73
Foursixty
74

Foursixty outperforms Apple in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 73). Apple leads in performance, best practices.

When to choose Apple

Choose Apple when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Foursixty

Choose Foursixty when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1275 audited Apple sites and 1 audited Foursixty sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Apple or Foursixty?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Apple sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 16 on average).
Which has better security, Apple or Foursixty?
Foursixty sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Apple or Foursixty?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Foursixty (93 vs 90). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Apple or Foursixty?
Foursixty sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Apple or Foursixty?
Foursixty sites show lower Time to First Byte (156 ms vs 317 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Apple or Foursixty for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Apple scores higher on overall composite score while Apple may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback