Skip to content

Apple vs Gelato

Based on 1337 and 1 real audits

View Apple details | View Gelato details
MetricAppleGelatoWinner
Performance4028Apple
Accessibility9096Gelato
Best Practices8692Gelato
SEO9092Gelato
Security6886Gelato
TTFB322ms130msGelato
Composite7381Gelato
Performance
Apple
40
Gelato
28
Accessibility
Apple
90
Gelato
96
Security
Apple
68
Gelato
86
SEO
Apple
90
Gelato
92
Composite
Apple
73
Gelato
81

Gelato outperforms Apple in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (81 vs 73). Apple leads in performance.

When to choose Apple

Choose Apple when your primary concern is performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Gelato

Choose Gelato when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1337 audited Apple sites and 1 audited Gelato sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Apple or Gelato?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Apple sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (40 vs 28 on average).
Which has better security, Apple or Gelato?
Gelato sites score higher on security analysis (86 vs 68 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Apple or Gelato?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Gelato (96 vs 90). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Apple or Gelato?
Gelato sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Apple or Gelato?
Gelato sites show lower Time to First Byte (130 ms vs 322 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Apple or Gelato for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Apple scores higher on overall composite score while Apple may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback