Skip to content

Apple vs Hansel

Based on 1275 and 1 real audits

View Apple details | View Hansel details
MetricAppleHanselWinner
Performance3935Apple
Accessibility9093Hansel
Best Practices8673Apple
SEO8992Hansel
Security6767Tie
TTFB317ms85msHansel
Composite7372Apple
Performance
Apple
39
Hansel
35
Accessibility
Apple
90
Hansel
93
Security
Apple
67
Hansel
67
SEO
Apple
89
Hansel
92
Composite
Apple
73
Hansel
72

Apple and Hansel are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Apple has a composite score of 73 while Hansel scores 72.

When to choose Apple

Choose Apple when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Hansel

Choose Hansel when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1275 audited Apple sites and 1 audited Hansel sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Apple or Hansel?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Apple sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (39 vs 35 on average).
Which has better security, Apple or Hansel?
Apple sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Apple or Hansel?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Hansel (93 vs 90). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Apple or Hansel?
Hansel sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Apple or Hansel?
Hansel sites show lower Time to First Byte (85 ms vs 317 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Apple or Hansel for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Apple scores higher on overall composite score while Apple may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback