Skip to content

Apple vs Maglr

Based on 1227 and 1 real audits

View Apple details | View Maglr details
MetricAppleMaglrWinner
Performance3825Apple
Accessibility9087Apple
Best Practices8673Apple
SEO89100Maglr
Security6664Apple
TTFB314ms571msApple
Composite7272Tie
Performance
Apple
38
Maglr
25
Accessibility
Apple
90
Maglr
87
Security
Apple
66
Maglr
64
SEO
Apple
89
Maglr
100
Composite
Apple
72
Maglr
72

Apple outperforms Maglr in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 72). Maglr leads in SEO.

When to choose Apple

Choose Apple when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Maglr

Choose Maglr when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1227 audited Apple sites and 1 audited Maglr sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Apple or Maglr?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Apple sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (38 vs 25 on average).
Which has better security, Apple or Maglr?
Apple sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 64 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Apple or Maglr?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Apple (90 vs 87). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Apple or Maglr?
Maglr sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (100 vs 89 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Apple or Maglr?
Apple sites show lower Time to First Byte (314 ms vs 571 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Apple or Maglr for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Apple scores higher on overall composite score while Apple may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback