Skip to content

Apple vs Negate

Based on 1276 and 1 real audits

View Apple details | View Negate details
MetricAppleNegateWinner
Performance3826Apple
Accessibility8977Apple
Best Practices8557Apple
SEO8985Apple
Security6777Negate
TTFB316ms126msNegate
Composite7370Apple
Performance
Apple
38
Negate
26
Accessibility
Apple
89
Negate
77
Security
Apple
67
Negate
77
SEO
Apple
89
Negate
85
Composite
Apple
73
Negate
70

Apple outperforms Negate in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 70). Negate leads in security, TTFB.

When to choose Apple

Choose Apple when your primary concern is best practices and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Negate

Choose Negate when your primary concern is server response time and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1276 audited Apple sites and 1 audited Negate sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, Apple or Negate?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Apple sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (38 vs 26 on average).
Which has better security, Apple or Negate?
Negate sites score higher on security analysis (77 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Apple or Negate?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Apple (89 vs 77). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Apple or Negate?
Apple sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (89 vs 85 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Apple or Negate?
Negate sites show lower Time to First Byte (126 ms vs 316 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Apple or Negate for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Apple scores higher on overall composite score while Apple may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback