Skip to content

Apple vs NS1

Based on 1267 and 158 real audits

View Apple details | View NS1 details
MetricAppleNS1Winner
Performance3941NS1
Accessibility9091NS1
Best Practices8687NS1
SEO8988Apple
Security6767Tie
TTFB318ms186msNS1
Composite7373Tie
Performance
Apple
39
NS1
41
Accessibility
Apple
90
NS1
91
Security
Apple
67
NS1
67
SEO
Apple
89
NS1
88
Composite
Apple
73
NS1
73

NS1 outperforms Apple in 4 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 73). Apple leads in SEO.

When to choose Apple

Choose Apple when your primary concern is SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose NS1

Choose NS1 when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 1267 audited Apple sites and 158 audited NS1 sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Apple or NS1?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, NS1 sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (41 vs 39 on average).
Which has better security, Apple or NS1?
Apple sites score higher on security analysis (67 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Apple or NS1?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor NS1 (91 vs 90). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Apple or NS1?
Apple sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (89 vs 88 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Apple or NS1?
NS1 sites show lower Time to First Byte (186 ms vs 318 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Apple or NS1 for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. NS1 scores higher on overall composite score while Apple may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback