| Metric | Appsflyer | Winner | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 28 | 38 | |
| Accessibility | 84 | 89 | |
| Best Practices | 83 | 84 | |
| SEO | 92 | 90 | Appsflyer |
| Security | 63 | 67 | |
| TTFB | 166ms | 280ms | Appsflyer |
| Composite | 71 | 72 |
Facebook outperforms Appsflyer in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 71). Appsflyer leads in SEO, TTFB.
Choose Appsflyer when your primary concern is server response time and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Facebook when your primary concern is performance and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 11 audited Appsflyer sites and 1407 audited Facebook sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback