Skip to content

Appsflyer vs HSTS

Based on 12 and 3637 real audits

MetricAppsflyerHSTSWinner
Performance2754HSTS
Accessibility8590HSTS
Best Practices8290HSTS
SEO9292Tie
Security6374HSTS
TTFB166ms421msAppsflyer
Composite7278HSTS
Performance
Appsflyer
27
HSTS
54
Accessibility
Appsflyer
85
HSTS
90
Security
Appsflyer
63
HSTS
74
SEO
Appsflyer
92
HSTS
92
Composite
Appsflyer
72
HSTS
78

HSTS outperforms Appsflyer in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (78 vs 72). Appsflyer leads in TTFB.

When to choose Appsflyer

Choose Appsflyer when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is performance and security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 12 audited Appsflyer sites and 3637 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Appsflyer or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, HSTS sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (54 vs 27 on average).
Which has better security, Appsflyer or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (74 vs 63 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Appsflyer or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor HSTS (90 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Appsflyer or HSTS?
Appsflyer sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 92 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Appsflyer or HSTS?
Appsflyer sites show lower Time to First Byte (166 ms vs 421 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Appsflyer or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. HSTS scores higher on overall composite score while Appsflyer may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.

Send Feedback