Based on 1 and 626 real audits
| Metric | Appstle | Facebook SDK | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 46 | 32 | Appstle |
| Accessibility | 92 | 88 | Appstle |
| Best Practices | 77 | 79 | Facebook SDK |
| SEO | 100 | 91 | Appstle |
| Security | 80 | 64 | Appstle |
| TTFB | 507ms | 393ms | Facebook SDK |
| Composite | 81 | 72 | Appstle |
Appstle outperforms Facebook SDK in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (81 vs 72). Facebook SDK leads in best practices, TTFB.
Choose Appstle when your primary concern is security and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Facebook SDK when your primary concern is server response time and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Appstle sites and 626 audited Facebook SDK sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback