| Metric | Appstle | Smile | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 46 | 46 | Tie |
| Accessibility | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Best Practices | 77 | 77 | Tie |
| SEO | 100 | 100 | Tie |
| Security | 80 | 80 | Tie |
| TTFB | 507ms | 507ms | Tie |
| Composite | 81 | 81 | Tie |
Appstle and Smile are closely matched, each leading in different categories. Appstle has a composite score of 81 while Smile scores 81.
Appstle doesn't clearly lead Smile in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Smile doesn't clearly lead Appstle in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 1 audited Appstle sites and 1 audited Smile sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback