Skip to content

Arc XP vs Google Tag Manager

Based on 29 and 2504 real audits

View Arc XP details | View Google Tag Manager details
MetricArc XPGoogle Tag ManagerWinner
Performance2440Google Tag Manager
Accessibility8588Google Tag Manager
Best Practices7986Google Tag Manager
SEO9091Google Tag Manager
Security6265Google Tag Manager
TTFB303ms372msArc XP
Composite7073Google Tag Manager
Performance
Arc XP
24
Google Tag Manager
40
Accessibility
Arc XP
85
Google Tag Manager
88
Security
Arc XP
62
Google Tag Manager
65
SEO
Arc XP
90
Google Tag Manager
91
Composite
Arc XP
70
Google Tag Manager
73

Google Tag Manager outperforms Arc XP in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (73 vs 70). Arc XP leads in TTFB.

When to choose Arc XP

Choose Arc XP when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Google Tag Manager

Choose Google Tag Manager when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 29 audited Arc XP sites and 2504 audited Google Tag Manager sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Arc XP or Google Tag Manager?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Google Tag Manager sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (40 vs 24 on average).
Which has better security, Arc XP or Google Tag Manager?
Google Tag Manager sites score higher on security analysis (65 vs 62 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Arc XP or Google Tag Manager?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Google Tag Manager (88 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Arc XP or Google Tag Manager?
Google Tag Manager sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Arc XP or Google Tag Manager?
Arc XP sites show lower Time to First Byte (303 ms vs 372 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Arc XP or Google Tag Manager for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Google Tag Manager scores higher on overall composite score while Arc XP may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback