Skip to content

Arc XP vs Open Graph

Based on 29 and 3415 real audits

View Arc XP details | View Open Graph details
MetricArc XPOpen GraphWinner
Performance2445Open Graph
Accessibility8589Open Graph
Best Practices7987Open Graph
SEO9092Open Graph
Security6266Open Graph
TTFB303ms365msArc XP
Composite7074Open Graph
Performance
Arc XP
24
Open Graph
45
Accessibility
Arc XP
85
Open Graph
89
Security
Arc XP
62
Open Graph
66
SEO
Arc XP
90
Open Graph
92
Composite
Arc XP
70
Open Graph
74

Open Graph outperforms Arc XP in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (74 vs 70). Arc XP leads in TTFB.

When to choose Arc XP

Choose Arc XP when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose Open Graph

Choose Open Graph when your primary concern is performance and best practices. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 29 audited Arc XP sites and 3415 audited Open Graph sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Arc XP or Open Graph?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (45 vs 24 on average).
Which has better security, Arc XP or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on security analysis (66 vs 62 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Arc XP or Open Graph?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Open Graph (89 vs 85). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Arc XP or Open Graph?
Open Graph sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (92 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Arc XP or Open Graph?
Arc XP sites show lower Time to First Byte (303 ms vs 365 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Arc XP or Open Graph for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Open Graph scores higher on overall composite score while Arc XP may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback