| Metric | Arc XP | VTEX | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 24 | 27 | VTEX |
| Accessibility | 85 | 78 | Arc XP |
| Best Practices | 79 | 77 | Arc XP |
| SEO | 90 | 85 | Arc XP |
| Security | 62 | 61 | Arc XP |
| TTFB | 303ms | 159ms | VTEX |
| Composite | 70 | 68 | Arc XP |
Arc XP outperforms VTEX in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (70 vs 68). VTEX leads in performance, TTFB.
Choose Arc XP when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose VTEX when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 29 audited Arc XP sites and 1 audited VTEX sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback