Skip to content

ArcSpan vs DoubleClick Floodlight

Based on 4 and 594 real audits

View ArcSpan details | View DoubleClick Floodlight details
MetricArcSpanDoubleClick FloodlightWinner
Performance2732DoubleClick Floodlight
Accessibility8087DoubleClick Floodlight
Best Practices7281DoubleClick Floodlight
SEO9091DoubleClick Floodlight
Security6264DoubleClick Floodlight
TTFB271ms340msArcSpan
Composite6972DoubleClick Floodlight
Performance
ArcSpan
27
DoubleClick Floodlight
32
Accessibility
ArcSpan
80
DoubleClick Floodlight
87
Security
ArcSpan
62
DoubleClick Floodlight
64
SEO
ArcSpan
90
DoubleClick Floodlight
91
Composite
ArcSpan
69
DoubleClick Floodlight
72

DoubleClick Floodlight outperforms ArcSpan in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (72 vs 69). ArcSpan leads in TTFB.

When to choose ArcSpan

Choose ArcSpan when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose DoubleClick Floodlight

Choose DoubleClick Floodlight when your primary concern is best practices and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 4 audited ArcSpan sites and 594 audited DoubleClick Floodlight sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.

FAQ

Which is faster, ArcSpan or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (32 vs 27 on average).
Which has better security, ArcSpan or DoubleClick Floodlight?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on security analysis (64 vs 62 on average).
Which has better accessibility, ArcSpan or DoubleClick Floodlight?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor DoubleClick Floodlight (87 vs 80). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, ArcSpan or DoubleClick Floodlight?
DoubleClick Floodlight sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (91 vs 90 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), ArcSpan or DoubleClick Floodlight?
ArcSpan sites show lower Time to First Byte (271 ms vs 340 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose ArcSpan or DoubleClick Floodlight for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. DoubleClick Floodlight scores higher on overall composite score while ArcSpan may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback