| Metric | Arkose Labs | Envoy | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 39 | 36 | Arkose Labs |
| Accessibility | 94 | 88 | Arkose Labs |
| Best Practices | 88 | 86 | Arkose Labs |
| SEO | 92 | 92 | Tie |
| Security | 71 | 67 | Arkose Labs |
| TTFB | 271ms | 293ms | Arkose Labs |
| Composite | 75 | 73 | Arkose Labs |
Arkose Labs outperforms Envoy in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (75 vs 73). Envoy leads in no categories.
Choose Arkose Labs when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Envoy doesn't clearly lead Arkose Labs in any category on the sampled sites — pick it based on developer experience, ecosystem, or existing team skills rather than the audit scores.
Scores are medians across 10 audited Arkose Labs sites and 86 audited Envoy sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback