| Metric | Aruba.it | MySQL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 65 | 48 | Aruba.it |
| Accessibility | 84 | 88 | MySQL |
| Best Practices | 89 | 87 | Aruba.it |
| SEO | 90 | 91 | MySQL |
| Security | 77 | 68 | Aruba.it |
| TTFB | 303ms | 473ms | Aruba.it |
| Composite | 80 | 76 | Aruba.it |
Aruba.it outperforms MySQL in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (80 vs 76). MySQL leads in accessibility, SEO.
Choose Aruba.it when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose MySQL when your primary concern is accessibility and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 10 audited Aruba.it sites and 649 audited MySQL sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback