| Metric | ASP.NET | Kentico CMS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 44 | 40 | ASP.NET |
| Accessibility | 85 | 88 | Kentico CMS |
| Best Practices | 84 | 84 | Tie |
| SEO | 89 | 87 | ASP.NET |
| Security | 64 | 63 | ASP.NET |
| TTFB | 547ms | 244ms | Kentico CMS |
| Composite | 71 | 72 | Kentico CMS |
ASP.NET and Kentico CMS are closely matched, each leading in different categories. ASP.NET has a composite score of 71 while Kentico CMS scores 72.
Choose ASP.NET when your primary concern is performance and SEO. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Kentico CMS when your primary concern is server response time and accessibility. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 53 audited ASP.NET sites and 7 audited Kentico CMS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Small sample: one or both technologies have fewer than 10 audited sites. Treat these numbers as directional — medians stabilize around 20–30 audits per side.
Send Feedback