Based on 53 and 60 real audits
| Metric | ASP.NET | Windows Server | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Performance | 44 | 45 | Windows Server |
| Accessibility | 85 | 88 | Windows Server |
| Best Practices | 84 | 85 | Windows Server |
| SEO | 89 | 90 | Windows Server |
| Security | 64 | 65 | Windows Server |
| TTFB | 547ms | 549ms | ASP.NET |
| Composite | 71 | 71 | Tie |
Windows Server outperforms ASP.NET in 5 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (71 vs 71). ASP.NET leads in TTFB.
Choose ASP.NET when your primary concern is server response time. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Choose Windows Server when your primary concern is accessibility and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.
Scores are medians across 53 audited ASP.NET sites and 60 audited Windows Server sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →
Send Feedback