Skip to content

Astro vs HSTS

Based on 54 and 2531 real audits

View Astro details | View HSTS details
MetricAstroHSTSWinner
Performance5448Astro
Accessibility9289Astro
Best Practices9187Astro
SEO9491Astro
Security6770HSTS
TTFB321ms362msAstro
Composite7675Astro
Performance
Astro
54
HSTS
48
Accessibility
Astro
92
HSTS
89
Security
Astro
67
HSTS
70
SEO
Astro
94
HSTS
91
Composite
Astro
76
HSTS
75

Astro outperforms HSTS in 6 of 7 categories, with a stronger composite score (76 vs 75). HSTS leads in security.

When to choose Astro

Choose Astro when your primary concern is server response time and performance. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

When to choose HSTS

Choose HSTS when your primary concern is security. Its audit data shows consistent strength in these areas across the sampled sites.

How this comparison was built

Scores are medians across 54 audited Astro sites and 2531 audited HSTS sites in the BeaverCheck database. Every audit runs the same 100+ checks — Lighthouse performance, security headers, accessibility, SEO, server response time — against a real URL. No vendor input, no sponsorship, no affiliate links. Read the full methodology →

FAQ

Which is faster, Astro or HSTS?
Based on real BeaverCheck audits, Astro sites score higher on Lighthouse performance (54 vs 48 on average).
Which has better security, Astro or HSTS?
HSTS sites score higher on security analysis (70 vs 67 on average).
Which has better accessibility, Astro or HSTS?
Accessibility scores measured by Lighthouse WCAG 2.1 checks favor Astro (92 vs 89). Both technologies can be made fully accessible with care — the difference reflects common patterns in the sampled sites, not inherent platform limits.
Which is better for SEO, Astro or HSTS?
Astro sites score higher on Lighthouse SEO signals (94 vs 91 on average), which cover meta tags, crawlability, mobile friendliness, and structured data. Content strategy and backlinks still matter more than platform choice for ranking.
Which has faster server response (TTFB), Astro or HSTS?
Astro sites show lower Time to First Byte (321 ms vs 362 ms on average). TTFB depends heavily on hosting and CDN setup rather than the technology itself, but the sampled sites suggest a meaningful difference in common deployment patterns.
Should I choose Astro or HSTS for my website?
Both platforms have trade-offs. Astro scores higher on overall composite score while Astro may excel in metrics you care about most. Run a free BeaverCheck audit on a real site using each to compare the metrics relevant to your use case.
Audit your own site

Send Feedback